Wednesday, July 18, 2012

Power Seen in Yanomama Tribe


Humans have evolved to such great extents, and we have made many advances however as our primitive ape ancestors took the first steps to humanness, modern day Homo sapiens still hold on to some of their primitive traits; violence. With violence, comes murder and this is seen in all different races and cultures. Our Western culture primarily perceives violence as punishable by date (note that not all states have accepted the death penalty, only 34 states have), and our perspective can be seen in different cultures from the French, circa French Revolution, to the modern day Yanomamo. Violence is perceived the same way in all culture; bad, however the thing that differs is the punishment for the violence and the mechanisms behind it. When we look at the Yanomamo we see that they, along with our Western culture, believe that violence and murder is worthy of punishment, but what differs is how that punishment is dealt. Our Western culture primarily believes in the death penalty, and those that don’t, believe in life servitude in correctional facilities. The Yanomamo people treat individuals who have committed acts of violence with hostile intent, just as some American states wish to carry out the death penalty. However the main difference is that, where all of Western culture believes that whoever committed the crime should be the only one guilty and dealt the punishment, the Yanomamo culture believes that kin to the individual who committed the act of violence can be held accounted for and have their lives taken. Where we find the death penalty, or jail rightful, they find that murder for vengeance to be viable.

The murders for vengeance, or revenge killings, all starts out with an individual’s kin passing away, either by direct murder or by indirect methods such as sorcery of shaman. The individual, possessing primitive traits of aggression, contemplates on who is guilty of this death. Once that individual has someone in mind or knows exactly who did it, he seeks out for revenge and kills of that individual or group. However, these revenge killings are almost circular in nature, in that they will always come back to haunt the murder. The individual or group that the grieving Yanomamo killed off will have kin that will then seek vengeance and this process will continue until one or the other starts to back off, and accept the status of cowardice.


Those who commit these revenge killings go through a ritual known as a unokaimou and are then known as unokais, which is translated by Chagnon to “those who have killed.” You could imagine that in an environment where vengeance is a common act, building some sort of reputation could help you ward off future murders. Thus by gaining the title of unokais, you start to develop the reputation of someone who should not be taken so lightly. In addition to building a reputation to protect yourself, the title of unikais can help attract more women, by the means that unikais can offer protection, and thus increase the unikais reproductive success. However, to first develop this status of unikais one has to kill, and in the Yanomamo culture those who kill are destined to die by the grieving Yanomamo’s hand and the only question to ponder is when? Non-unikais have just as much advantage as unikais in that they are not faced with the great possibility of being vengefully killed, and thus can in turn have great reproductive success as well.


In actuality, there are some benefits of revenge killing seen by Chagnon in the Yanomamo tribe. Revenge killing has increased the closeness and size of kin. Kinship has been benefited from revenge killing by having more kin to be there for the grieving individual and support him in his turn to seek vengeance. The more kin they have in support for them, the more likely the revenge killing will take place. However, with so much of the Yanomamo marriages occurring within the family, the harder it is for the Yanomamo to decide whether the revenge killings to be carried out if there family was in another community and murdered. Thus their social and political structure is now affected as well. The Yanomamo have no systematic social or political structure, the closet they come to having some distinction in power is when an individual acquires the title unikais or the leader of a community, a patas. Marriage and reproduction is greatly affected by revenge killings, and by Chagnon’s observations, is governed by it. Those who acquire the unikais status, given to only those who have successfully carried out killing another for vengeance, are high prized by the women in the Yanomamo tribe, and are more sought out for than non unikais.

With steps towards humanness, we still held on to our primitive traits of violence. In our modern society killing another human being is one of the worst and frightening things a human is capable of. True, no one is born with the intention to kill, however sometimes people are put into situations where previous genetic and environmental effects have wired their brain to respond to this situation by murder, or in the case of the Yanomamo revenge killings. This is why we have laws for such acts. These laws do not only act as a deterrent to stop people from committing a murder but they also punish those who have somehow managed to bring themselves to commit such a crime.

4 comments:

  1. I really liked reading your post, you were very insightful.

    I have been doing my ethnography project on the Yanomamo Indians, and I noticed that you said all cultures, including the Yanomamo, perceive violence as bad. They do take deaths very seriosuly, but violence is not necessarily negative for them. Our society shows that we do not tolerate violoence because we do not repay violence with violence, thus setting the standard that violence is not tolerable. I think saying that the Yanomamo have s strong sense of honor and justice (albeit their interpretation of justice) is more accurate. Violence is a tool, and one that affects many aspects of their lives.

    I do agree with your conclusion- our laws are a deterrent for future crime. I think it is interesting that the Yanomamo do not have laws, so their violence becomes the deterrent, and cause, for more violence.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Nicely written!

    I like how you bring up genetics into the explanation at the end. Fight or flight is hardwired into our genetics so its a good point to bring up. I agree with you that laws do act as a deterrent but often times the fight reflex is triggered and acts such as murder become easier to commit.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Its scary to think if we were born into a society that didn't have the laws that it has and doesnt have a third party to punish the murderes for us. Because like the Yanomamos, the murders would come full circle and back around again. Thats why so many people die by violance in that culture. Don't get me wrong we in the Unites States have our share of violance everyday but think if revenge killing was the norm. The number of deaths would be mind blowing.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I appreciate the historical perspective on the comparison between our two systems. Good insight equating the Yanomamo system to our death penalty, but I also like how you point out that within our system, technically the only one to pay the punishment is the criminal, while in the Yanomamo, the kin group is eligible for punishment.

    Yes, this system is circular in nature! But there is one thing that can slow it down or stop it, at least temporarily. If one kin group becomes notorious for their violent responses to killing of their kin, other groups may think twice before killing a member of that particularly aggressive group. Comes close to a group selection issue, though not quite.

    You argue: "Non-unikais have just as much advantage as unikais in that they are not faced with the great possibility of being vengefully killed, and thus can in turn have great reproductive success as well."

    Is this what the evidence suggests from the article? Non-unokais are less attractive to mates and more likely to be cuckolded by other more powerful males. Yes, they live longer, but does this really add up to equal reproductive success?

    Excellent section on the impact on other aspects of their culture and great final paragraph, pulling in environmental and genetic influences.

    ReplyDelete