One of the major steps to humanness is the evolution of
speech. Our early ancestors, after becoming mobile and acquiring the human’s
characteristic bipedal trait, started to develop and form speech. However, one
can always ask “How does our speech and communication differ from other
primates and mammals?” The thing is, us humans have developed our own system
for speech, with a set of alphabets that can be used by anyone to form language
and speech. This week’s assignment was to test the different components of
speech and language, that is 1) the component of symbolic language and 2) the
physical component of speech.
Part 1
The first portion of this experiment required me to not use
any sort of symbolic language that is speaking, writing, or sign language. This
scenario accounted for the use of speech itself, and put me in a state where my
ideas could not be conveyed through speech but only physically communicated,
almost like other mammals. To be completely honest though, this was not as hard
as it sounded when I first read it. I performed the experiment with my brother,
so there was a little bias there (as in if I pointed to something random it was
because it usually had some significant event coupled to it that we both knew
of), however I managed to convey my ideas and opinions. It was not as difficult
because there were no limits to what I could do physically to communicate my
thoughts and my signals did not get misinterpreted, that is they were discrete
physical actions that could only mean one thing (eg. If I pointed to the
television, my brother knew I was talking about the television). As the
experiment went on, my brother started to acclimate to the scenario, however in
the beginning there were some issues. At first, it was more difficult for him
to understand what was happening, he would guess a lot and was confused
sometimes, but after a while things picked up. In addition, I also noticed he
was using more than usual hand movements and physical cues during our
conversation, as in he would point to things more, he would nod his head in
agreement or disagreement with his verbal response. Now, if my brother and I
represented two different cultures meeting for the first time, he would have
the advantage in developing and communicating complex ideas due to the fact
that he can rely not only on physical communication, but he will have access to
an established language system, and can use symbolic language by speaking
ideas, or writing them out. My brother (culture that uses symbolic language)
will most likely have the belief that I (culture that does not use symbolic
language) am the inferior one. However, in our society today, we have many
people today who are not able to utilize symbolic language to communicate, but
we still see them as equals, for example those who are born without the
capability to hear (i.e. through deafness) or those who are born with
difficulties developing language and speech (i.e. through mental retardation). From
personal experience, having an uncle who is deaf, it sometimes can be hard to
communicate with him, and I always seem to heavily rely on physical
communication and hand movements, even though he is very fluent in American
Sign Language. The way I see it, is that those people who are seen as
“inferior” seem to be more superior than us due to the fact that they not only
need to interpret what we say with our complex ideas and symbolic language, but
they have to process it and respond back with their simplistic communicational
methods.
Part 2
The second experiment analyzed the use of symbolic language
but one person was denied any physical means of communication, so no change in
tone of voice, facial expression, hand movements, etc. Both, my brother and I,
found this experiment to be more difficult (and fun) because every time we
started our conversation we would both break out into laughter because of the
seriousness on our faces. Therefore, on multiple tries, failed to last the full
15 minutes but not just because of the laughter but also it seemed hard for me
to refrain from using facial expressions. As my brother and I attempted to
complete the task at hand, my brother did not find it difficult to understand
what I was saying but found it hard to interpret how I felt about what I was
saying. He did not get how I felt about what we were talking about. He stated
“it was like you had no opinion, even though you were literally telling me you
agreed with me.” This experiment shows us the importance of communicating
through physical ways, and that this simplistic approach to communication is
needed to express ideas accurately and with ease. The reason why is because
with symbolic language facts, concepts, and laws are easily conveyed however
“signs” and non-speech language techniques are needed to express ideas,
thoughts, and opinions. In today’s society, there are many individuals that
have a hard time interpreting body languages, and it can range from people like
you and me to those who physically do not have the capability to see physical
cues and motions, that is blind individuals. People who are blind sometimes can
be at a disadvantage because they do not have access to how ones idea looks
like, or feels like which is conveyed through facial expressions, hand
movements, etc. There are not many environmental conditions I can think of
where not reading body language is beneficial, however I can think of certain
physical conditions where it is not beneficial to read body language, and that
is when an individual is diagnosed with tourette syndrome. A person with
tourette syndrome might communicate an unwanted, and depending on the situation
inappropriate, physical gesture or sign, therefore it would be beneficial for
one not to interpret those physical gestures literally.
Part 3
Writing is considered a type of symbolic language, so if we
were allowed to use it in the first experiment it would have made things
easier, however there would be no reason to perform the experiment then because
one can convey complex ideas and thoughts with writing. It is very beneficial
for a culture to develop writing because once an established system is created
for the use of forming words (i.e. an alphabet), that culture now has access to
a reliable and constant system to communicate with one another. This way,
complex ideas can easily be communicated with all those who comprehend that
system of symbols. Another advantage is that writing allows the preservation of
ideas, facts, opinions, etc. that can be revisited in a later time. This
advantage of having access to writing, leads to the spread of that
idea/knowledge, which is known as globalization. It is because of the
development of writing why we can gain knowledge on the concept of
globalization itself. It is true that globalization can be spread through other
mediums, such as speech, however the idea can not be expressed systematically
for others to have access to.